This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology theory!

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
Michael Mozina
Posts: 1701
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Contact:

This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology theory!

Unread post by Michael Mozina » Sat Aug 29, 2015 12:34 pm

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/New_t ... n_999.html
"Ever since the beginning of quantum mechanics people have been looking for a configuration which could explain the stability of atoms and why orbiting electrons do not radiate," Dr Miroshnichenko said.

The absence of radiation is the result of the current being divided between two different components, a conventional electric dipole and a toroidal dipole (associated with poloidal current configuration), which produce identical fields at a distance.

If these two configurations are out of phase then the radiation will be cancelled out, even though the electromagnetic fields are non-zero in the area close to the currents.

Dr Miroshnichenko, in collaboration with colleagues from Germany and Singapore, successfully tested his new theory with a single silicon nanodiscs between 160 and 310 nanometres in diameter and 50 nanometres high, which he was able to make effectively invisible by cancelling the disc's scattering of visible light.

So basically if the alignment of the electric dipole and a toroidal dipole fields in the material are in phase, there's no scattering of visible light, but if the fields in the material are out of phase, there's a potential for a scattering process to occur in the material.

This has *huge* implications in the area of cosmology theory by the way. It goes another step further in explaining any "missing mass" that might not be easy to 'see' over great distances, simply because it's an ordinary dusty plasma in a phased configuration.

It demonstrates yet another flaw in the mainstream's claims about any need for exotic forms of matter to explain why we cannot see some forms of ordinary matter over great distances. It could simply be that ordinary matter in the form of a dusty plasma is simply not interacting with light that much due to the particular condition of that plasma. Particularly over large distances, the net effect could be huge and highly significant. There's no need for exotic forms of matter to explain why it's difficult for us to see every form and arrangement of *ordinary* baryonic materials.

There's never been any need for exotic forms of matter to even explain "missing mass", otherwise erroneously called "dark matter". All we need is synchronized arrangement in ordinary materials to explain why some forms of ordinary baryonic matter isn't easily observed.

Lambda-CDM is on it's way down the supernatural drain of physics. It's running headlong into the arms of EU/PC theory, and the realities of empirical physics by the day. There's never been a need for any form of exotic matter to explain any "missing mass" in spacetime. Since we live in an electromagnetically active plasma universe, there's really no limit to the way in which various electrons and protons and even positrons might be arranged and configured in materials in space.

Not only did they underestimate the stellar mass estimates by whopping factors of between 3 and 20 in that 2006 lensing study, they simply couldn't see some of the ordinary baryonic matter because it happens to be in phase.

Because EU/PC theory is based on pure empirical physics it is necessarily destined to replace and trump supernatural claims about cosmology physics eventually, and now the handwriting is most certainly on the wall with respect to exotic matter theory. You don't need an exotic form of matter to create a non scattering "dark" plasma, you just need the right phase in the plasma and/or dust in the plasma. :)

Not only that, he's actually demonstrated the effect in the lab! Wow!

Love it! Yeah for empirical physics!

Michael Mozina
Posts: 1701
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Contact:

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by Michael Mozina » Sat Aug 29, 2015 12:45 pm

Dr Miroshnichenko said the confined energy of anapoles could be important in the development of tiny lasers on the surface of materials, called spasers, and also in the creation of efficient X-ray lasers by high-order harmonic generation.
This also has implications as it relates to "black hole" theory in particular. The mainstream typically calculates the mass of heavy objects in a "gravity only" configuration. Their need for "supermassive" black holes in particular may simply be due to the fact that the current running through the center mass object is able to efficiently produce x-rays rather than any real need for a huge amount of mass.

It may be that all objects are limited to some "maximum size" before the whole thing finally goes supernova and emits at least part of it's energy as light. If there's some amount of remaining mass, it's condensed again by the current and the mass build up begins again.

I do believe that there's a massive object at the core of every galaxy that's been pinched together by the current and that rotates at incredibly fast speeds. The object however need not necessarily be massive, it may simply need to be carrying a lot of current and rotating rapidly.

Webbman
Posts: 533
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:49 am

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by Webbman » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:16 pm

thanks but I think ill stick to my double helix.

rock on though. . At least until tomorrow. :)

I think my torrodial dipole just went out of phase....
its all lies.

Michael Mozina
Posts: 1701
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Contact:

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by Michael Mozina » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:51 pm

Webbman wrote:thanks but I think ill stick to my double helix.

rock on though. . At least until tomorrow. :)

I think my torrodial dipole just went out of phase....
From my perspective if puts another nail in the coffin of exotic matter to theory to be sure. I'm also wondering if this has any implications in terms of potential AC/DC effects/configuration aspects. Does it only occur in DC (or AC) scenarios for instance?

http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/15082 ... s9069.html

I'm about to sit down and read the paper which you can find at the link above.

Michael Mozina
Posts: 1701
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Contact:

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by Michael Mozina » Sat Aug 29, 2015 2:09 pm

Page 2
Figure 1 | Illustration of an anapole excitation.
The toroidal dipole moment is associated with the circulating magnetic field M accompanied by electric poloidal current distribution. Since the symmetry of the radiation patterns of the electric P and toroidal T dipole modes are similar, they can destructively interfere leading to total scattering cancelation in the far-field
with non-zero near-field excitation.
It pretty much looks like the definition of a "Birkeland Current".

querious
Posts: 564
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:29 pm

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by querious » Sun Aug 30, 2015 7:41 am

Michael Mozina wrote:This has *huge* implications in the area of cosmology theory by the way. It goes another step further in explaining any "missing mass" that might not be easy to 'see' over great distances, simply because it's an ordinary dusty plasma in a phased configuration.
That is a huge leap. If it's a plasma, then by definition it has electric fields. Only if there was some tendency for the dusty plasma to form these anapole structures naturally would it work. And if I understood this article correctly, the anapoles in this experiment (silicon nano-discs) are non-scattering only for certain frequencies of light (visible, in this case), not the entire spectrum, as would be required of dark matter. I imagine any other macroscopic anapole configuration, would be similarly limited in it's non-scattering spectra.

Michael Mozina
Posts: 1701
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Contact:

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by Michael Mozina » Sun Aug 30, 2015 9:24 am

querious wrote:
Michael Mozina wrote:This has *huge* implications in the area of cosmology theory by the way. It goes another step further in explaining any "missing mass" that might not be easy to 'see' over great distances, simply because it's an ordinary dusty plasma in a phased configuration.
That is a huge leap. If it's a plasma, then by definition it has electric fields. Only if there was some tendency for the dusty plasma to form these anapole structures naturally would it work. And if I understood this article correctly, the anapoles in this experiment (silicon nano-discs) are non-scattering only for certain frequencies of light (visible, in this case), not the entire spectrum, as would be required of dark matter. I imagine any other macroscopic anapole configuration, would be similarly limited in it's non-scattering spectra.
Birkeland currents do form naturally, but after reading the full paper, I'm actually inclined to agree with you in terms of the "certain frequencies" aspects. Compared to the fact that the mainstream botched the stellar mass estimate in that 2006 lensing study by between 3 and 20 times, the likely net effect from something like this seems relatively minor in comparison. Oh well, I guess I just got excited about the fact that there is yet another logical way that ordinary matter can be 'missed' by the mainstream.

I did think it was interesting that they mentioned the concept with respect to "dark matter" theory (hypothetical axions). You'd have to assume that those same frequency dependent aspects would also apply to 'dark matter' if they're using that same concept with respect to dark matter theory. If anything, it does seem to point out frequency dependence aspect of DM theory that I otherwise wouldn't have thought much about. The paper was well worth reading to be sure.

Michael Mozina
Posts: 1701
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Contact:

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by Michael Mozina » Sun Aug 30, 2015 10:19 am

One of the points from this paper that is very interesting is this statement:
Image

This is a description of the electric dipole moments inside the particle by using the current Cartesian multipoles. In Fig. 2c we plot the dependence of both electric dipole moments for a dielectric sphere versus diameter, where only the electric field of the spherical electric dipole inside the particle was taken into account. This figure demonstrates that for small particle sizes both approaches produce similar results. For larger particles, the two descriptions deviate from each other quite strongly. In particular, there is a situation for the diameter ~204 nm, when the electric dipole scattering vanishes, Psph=0, while the induced electric dipole inside the particle is non-zero, |Pcar|≠0. In this case we have an apparent contradiction that there is a source of the electric dipole response, but no contribution to the far-field. Similarly, an opposite situation exists for the diameter around 196 nm, when the induced electric dipole moments inside the particle vanishes, Pcar=0, while there is a non-zero contribution to the far-field |Psph|≠0. In this case, we have a finite contribution to the far-field in the absence of a source!
They then point out the following with respect to the different results from the two different approaches:
We notice, that among these higher order current Cartesian coefficients there are toroidal dipole moments with a radiation pattern similar to the electric dipole (see, for example, Supplementary Information in ref. 33). Image
It tends to make me wonder how accurate the mathematical scattering models have really been up until now. One of them seemed to be accurate. The other main method was apparently missing some vital aspects of the interaction between light and matter. The authors do explain how to resolve the differences and verify that they achieve the same results after "upgrading" the Cartesian system.

querious
Posts: 564
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:29 pm

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by querious » Sun Aug 30, 2015 10:52 am

Michael Mozina wrote:You'd have to assume that those same frequency dependent aspects would also apply to 'dark matter' if they're using that same concept with respect to dark matter theory. If anything, it does seem to point out frequency dependence aspect of DM theory that I otherwise wouldn't have thought much about.
The idea was that DM could be anapolar Majorana Fermions, which, as required, would be non-scattering to all spectra. However, they'd be new fundamental particles, not macroscopic structures...

Previous studies have suggested that dark matter is made from Majorana fermions, whose existence was predicted in 1937 by the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana. In the new study, Vanderbilt scientists have performed detailed calculations that demonstrate that these particles are uniquely suited to possess a rare, donut-shaped type of electromagnetic field called an anapole.

Although, I think these were ruled out by the LHC, which is why you find little reference to this promising idea now. (Promising in the sense that no radically new physics is required, as Majorana fermions have long been predicted by standard theory, but never observed, so far.)

Michael Mozina
Posts: 1701
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Contact:

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by Michael Mozina » Sun Aug 30, 2015 10:59 am

querious wrote:
Michael Mozina wrote:You'd have to assume that those same frequency dependent aspects would also apply to 'dark matter' if they're using that same concept with respect to dark matter theory. If anything, it does seem to point out frequency dependence aspect of DM theory that I otherwise wouldn't have thought much about.
Some DM could be anapolar Majorana Fermions, which, as required, would be non-scattering to all spectra. These would be new fundamental particles, not macroscopic structures...

Previous studies have suggested that dark matter is made from Majorana fermions, whose existence was predicted in 1937 by the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana. In the new study, Vanderbilt scientists have performed detailed calculations that demonstrate that these particles are uniquely suited to possess a rare, donut-shaped type of electromagnetic field called an anapole.

Although, I think these were ruled out by the LHC, which is why you find little reference to this promising idea now.
Ah. Thanks for the insights with respect to the donut-shape aspects, although I would think that such shapes could still be arranged at random angles with respect to the light source. LHC hasn't been kind to SUSY theory anyway, but it's interesting IMO.

Empirical physics is actually quite fascinating, even if the mainstream finds it too limiting for their needs. The fact they found variations in the two different scattering maths was quite the revelation from my perspective. I can't help but wonder what sort of of scattering models they're been using in their formulas up till now. :)

Michael Mozina
Posts: 1701
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
Contact:

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by Michael Mozina » Sun Aug 30, 2015 11:26 am

I think one more key point from this new paper should be noted:
This simple consideration creates the basis for understanding of physics of the anapole mode, namely, mutual compensation of lower and part of the higher order components with a nontrivial current distribution inside the particle.
The basic requirement of the anapole mode is a nontrivial current distribution. This would suggest that the mainstream would be more likely to underestimate the mass of current carrying structures, particularly with respect to specific wavelengths that might be sensitive to those specific plasma conditions. It is another obvious way to demonstrate that the mainstream's mass estimation techniques are the real problem, rather than any need for exotic forms of matter. With any non trivial current running through the system, their models start to become suspect and potentially overly-simplistic.

Considering the fact that they botched the stellar mass estimates by between 3 and 20 times in that flawed 2006 lensing study anyway, this seems almost irrelevant. I hardly think it really matters how much mass they missed from this particular flaw in their mathematical models, but it is actually another demonstration that the mainstream's bayronic mass estimate techniques are based on a host of oversimplification fallacies. There never was any need for exotic forms of matter, we just need to better understand the conditions in the plasma, and make better baryonic mass estimates.

I'm really wondering what is going to happen to dark matter theory if LHC comes up with nothing useful in the higher energy studies, which does seem highly likely at this point. Will it actually get them to reconsider the problems in their own mass estimation techniques, or will they still pretend it never happened, and try to fund even higher energy experiments? When exactly does their exotic stable matter snipe hunt end?

User avatar
webolife
Posts: 2539
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:01 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by webolife » Sun Aug 30, 2015 12:46 pm

Michael,
I'm interested to hear your take on one aspect of my [geometrically based] mass concept.
Phased plasma considerations notwithstanding, it is clear that mass is computed to be at the centroid of an object, aka the center of gravity or center of mass, whether or not any object exists there (a basketball, or any toroidal description will suffice as examples). Thus I've mused in past threads and posts that the sheer mass of any galaxy, if computed to its centroid, might suggest a super massive object there, where none is needed. Given the PC and EU hypotheses for AGCs being essentially plasma pinches, I realize there is still a conflict of paradigms to be addressed, just curious what you might have to say about it...?
Truth extends beyond the border of self-limiting science. Free discourse among opposing viewpoints draws the open-minded away from the darkness of inevitable bias and nearer to the light of universal reality.

User avatar
SDK
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:27 am
Location: Canada or Czech Republic

Re: This discovery will rock the universe, and cosmology the

Unread post by SDK » Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:33 am

:) Anapole, a dolphins play https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzQGMvIFD9o

There are many more such videos and some show very interesting behavior, especially a stable velocity, disregard for buoyancy and one I can't find any longer, showing a step like change in velocity of the ring.

With kind regards, Slavek.
Watch out for who shines on your path.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests