How to "fix" the BB flaws - using Black Holes????

[+EyeOn-W-ANeed2Know]

While trying to find some up-to-date info on the E-CAT LENR device, I came a cross this.
(As I don't agree either BB or BHs, I can't help but think it's similar to attempting to dig one's way out of a bottomless pit)

Introduction
In this paper by highlighting the following 28 major short comings of modern big bang cosmology the authors made an attempt to develop a possible model of Black hole cosmology in a constructive way

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.c ... mology.pdf

[Cargo]

Better link: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=876

What's more interesting that this paper though, is the comments on this page about cold fusion, e-cat, and lenr
Read some of them, there appears to be real excess heat(energy) being created by competing China/Russia teams.

Particularly lovely is this comment:

ing. Michelangelo De Meo
June 30, 2015 at 2:49 AM

Hello Dr. Rossi , I suppose you will be delighted reading this comment.

From the times of Tesla in the 1890s, Cold fusion has been discovered and then forgotten and then later rediscovered in a tragic cycle of frustration and forgetfulness. Tesla may have been the first. There is a persistent urban legend about Nikola Tesla. The prolific Serbian inventor who claimed that his greatest achievement, the achievement that he was most proud of, was not alternating current or the radio, but a high voltage tube which could produce energy and transmute materials.

http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/06/29/le ... axil-axil/

[+EyeOn-W-ANeed2Know]

Oh yes. I did read that in connection with my original search.
I've seen a number of attempts to debunk/discredit the ECAT, but it was carefully checked by independent investigation verifying that it was not only running in "self-support mode" but produced excess usable heat. If there's one thing we know about today's high end financial backers - they very rarely accept any inventor's claims without results thoroughly supported by their own private investigations. Even with the usually lethal "Curse of Cold Fusion" hanging over it, the ECAT has also been awarded a patent in the US.
It's still trapped in "conspiracy theory no-mans land" though... and that is the true mystery.
If there are no deliberate forces actively working against it, then why the heck it isn't being promoted by every mainstream media service on the planet resulting in the tech being fast-tracked into production to provide the safe power our world so desperately needs.

There are a number of LENR/LANR devices that show genuine results from excess heat to the deposition of elements that weren't part of the original experiment.
Personally, I'm rather disappointed that the 2H/Pd/Zeolite research of Dr. Iraj Parchamazad & Dr. Melvin Miles hasn't gotten any more attention especially considering that the high energy density & consistency of replication seemed so promising.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2L-lKozWjSA


The point I posted in this section concerned my surprise when I continued down the list on the site & found that one proposal about "Black Hole Cosmology".
I was just wondering what other EU minded folks here thought of it.

[Cargo]

For me personally, and I'm just a person who believes that EU offers true common sense instead of mystic creations.

I find it a non-starter because s BH is an impossible non-reality object, it's a Unicorn. So there can be no premise or thought built on it that would ever earn any merit other then to fuel Science Fiction books.

[+EyeOn-W-ANeed2Know]

For me personally, and I'm just a person who believes that EU offers true common sense instead of mystic creations.

I find it a non-starter because s BH is an impossible non-reality object, it's a Unicorn. So there can be no premise or thought built on it that would ever earn any merit other then to fuel Science Fiction books.

Oh I thoroughly agree - hence my "think it's similar to attempting to dig one's way out of a bottomless pit" comment in the initial post.

**Though I will admit find the wording of "mystic creation" as somewhat troublesome.
Personally, I cannot ignore the thread of correlations in various creation mythos of ancient cultures.
LOL! I've been told "it's an unscientific premise", but IMHO I find it equally unscientific to dismiss out of hand the potential of Intelligent Design from localized "creation" events.
The sciences may be able to accurately describe the processes involved, but those employing them will never be able to identify if there is actually a purpose if the concept itself is automatically ignored.