![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
(FMV 5-16-08: Removed mild swearing & excessive punctuation.)
The voices in my head agree unaminously.None of us are really normal
If you like that, you'll probably love Kristian Birkeland's book Norwegian Aurora Polaris Expedition. It's available as a scanned [public domain] PDF from http://www.archive.org, but it's like 100+ MB, so you'd need broadband, and even then it might still take quite a while to fully download.pawel wrote:Quote from Hermann Bondi's book - The Universe at large:
"It seems more and more as though, once we go away from the earth, magnetism increases enormously in importance. In our vicinity this is shown by the radiation belt I have just described. Farther away magnetic stars and especially the interstellar magnetic fields are a dominant force. We will not be able to understand the construction of galaxies fully until we have mastered the understanding of the magnetic fields in outer space."
How it is possible? Book written 50 years ago is far, far more sensible than contemporary artificial-science writers. I have at home polish translation of "The five ages of the Universe" by Adams/Laughin. This book is presumed to describe Big Bang hypothesis, anyway what I love in that book it's only one chapter, where both guys SERIOUSLY (!!!) consider aliens invasion of our planet Earth![]()
Thanks for the replies![]()
pawel
The key appears to be to keep in mind James Clerk Maxwell and understand the "electromagnetic field."Bondi wrote:It seems more and more as though, once we go away from the earth, magnetism increases enormously in importance. In our vicinity this is shown by the radiation belt I have just described. Farther away magnetic stars and especially the interstellar magnetic fields are a dominant force. We will not be able to understand the construction of galaxies fully until we have mastered the understanding of the magnetic fields in outer space.
(Modified slightly to add a couple links to related article; no change in overall verbiage aside from snipping an unnecessary bit.)In the electromagnetic field article, Wikipedia wrote:The electromagnetic field is a physical field produced by electrically charged objects. It affects the behavior of charged objects in the vicinity of the field.
[...]
The field can be viewed as the combination of an electric field and a magnetic field. The electric field is produced by stationary charges, and the magnetic field [is produced] by moving charges (currents); these two are often described as the sources of the field. The way in which charges and currents interact with the electromagnetic field is described by Maxwell's equations and the Lorentz force law.
I think the AVERAGE personpawel wrote:I am convinced to the idea of electromagnetic forces presence in outer space for many, many YEARS! I've posted recently an article on sci.astro.research, I've got 6 answers but the moderators canceled my response. And it was quite complicated and interesting issue. Expecting some welcome words! Pawel![]()
I don't know that it's necessarily that they don't understand science. Many of them have gone through what many consider rigorous mainstream education on the subject and in fact understand science relatively well. I think the problem sometimes lies in the fact that they've been so ingrained with specific sets of ideas that anything outside the boundaries of what they've been specifically trained on seems "foreign" and therefore "dangerous" or "potentially not correct" (from the point of view of the paradigm with which they've been inculcated).shrunkensimon wrote:Pawel,
If people are open minded and intelligent enough, IMHO they will recognize straight away that Plasma Cosmology/EU theory is on the right track. It tends to be those who don't actually understand science, or at least the basics well enough, that tend to fly off the handle when you put forward the idea that a pillar of their existence belief structure is faulty, if not outright plain wrong!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest