The following post was introduced at the beginning of this month in the hope of input in another forum,
to date receiving no comments yet. So, it has been posted here to entice your responses for better or
worse, refinement or rejection. I've become familiar with the latter but the latest blip that may have
brought you here from the t-bolts update, ;
"The Lightning-Scarred Planet Mars"
"One of the principles of the Electric Universe is that planetary surfaces were shaped by past electrical conditions."
might reveal the broadening of initial notions introduced in association with the mythic record
and with emphasis on interplanetary scarring. d...z
Sept 1, 2013, (private forum)
We know with a relatively high level of certianty that our planet is involved in two
levels of lightning or electrical activity,,, one we can reproduce on a daily basis
in the dry environment of our homes and similar conditions where strong electrical
exchange can be effected when the potential develops. In nature, there is a
similar potential which develops due to atmospheric activity,, such as wind blown
across an isolated span of wire, imparting a state of charge in them that creates
a dangerous condition if touched.. Similar conditions reqire static dischargers on
aircraft and the like.
Another level of discharge is not so easily experienced and involves interaction
between the electrical evironment of space and our atmosphere,, seen as those
long-dismissed upper atmospheric light anomolies. These boundary-crossing events
are often associated with large storms. Some people might suggest that all storm
electricity has a boundary-crossing connection,, but that may be a stretch.
Our atmosphere does much to isolate us from the direct affect of those larger
events but what if we had a smaller gap between the ionospheric boundary
and the planet's surface, is this accomplished in part during those huge
storms which produce extreme lightning? The scars of these events could be
consider as a form of self scarring which involves ONLY THE PLANET AND ITS
SURROUNDING ENVIORNMENT, in contrast to what might occur if two
planetary bodies were to come into close proximity.
On a daily basis our planet experiences self-scarring so why not other bodies
that are within the same electrical environment of the sun but have differing
degrees of atmospheric separation from the ionospheric boundary, or could
it be called its double layer? Do planets with thin atmospheres also have
an ionospheric boundary? If so, then their surface features need not be
regarded
entirely [added today for clarification] as a remnant of some distant event, yet
rather as ongoing modification of the surface in self-scarring fashion.
The thunderbolts project has focused on the type of scarring which would
be classified as inter-planetary discharges but these events may not
account for as many features as are visibly present today. We should
expect some level of scarring from the huge dust storms on Mars in the
form of common electrical discharge patterns, including craters. We should
also consider the scarring of comets as a form of self-scarring. From this we
can differentiate those scars from those formed by planetary interactions.
Experiments at various levels of electrical potential have given evidence
that calls for considration of various types of planetary electrical activity and
the scarring which results. Craters can be formed without a hint of visible
electrical activity,, just the displacement of material in very specific patterns.
Also, material can be removed en-mass without a hint of visible electrical
activity. The features formed in these experiments match planetary features
in great detail with many residual processes to lend further comparison.
As hinted to years ago with Transient Lunar Phenomona, so to with
activity and features on Mars and elsewhere,, there are self-scarring
processes which can be differentiated from the "proposed" inter-planetary
discharges by the freshness of their signitures.
If the only electrical experiments which get press-time are the high energy
ones which blast at material with little subtilty, then we may be missing
a vast array of conditions which leave signitures of more recent activity
that speaks of the self-scarring nature behind planetary sculpting... d...z
http://para-az.com/eltricu-lbgrp/electro-lifting.html
...